tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8433456607242913787.post5199755905904336874..comments2010-03-10T14:26:05.465-05:00John Lovetthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09954262939608647312noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8433456607242913787.post-22294497486610815342009-11-09T05:28:48.013-05:002009-11-09T05:28:48.013-05:00I found this site using [url=http://google.com]google.com[/url] And i want to thank you for your work. You have done really very good site. Great work, great site! Thank you!<br /><br />Sorry for offtopicAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8433456607242913787.post-39148393194325842732007-08-24T14:14:00.000-04:002007-08-24T14:14:00.000-04:00Here's the quote John. The topic was "drilling too deep" into the data which causes the error rate to rise...a matter of precision versus accuracy. In other words, better to be directionally right than absolutely wrong...<BR/><BR/>��my experience leads me to believe that the harder you try to nail this stuff down, the more you simply move the problem from a known place to an unknown place. You take a spotlight and see the problem, pound it with a hammer and it shatters into hundreds of smaller pieces that disappear into dark corners. Crude analogy I'm sure, but there's some truth here.�<BR/> <BR/>- John Marshall, CEO ClickTracks, Yahoo Forum<BR/><BR/>Thanks for the mention!Jim Novohttp://blog.jimnovo.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8433456607242913787.post-3549170942437497562007-08-24T13:51:00.000-04:002007-08-24T13:51:00.000-04:00Thanks for the kind words John. It was great that you could make it!jsterne123http://www.blogger.com/profile/16444775950416778791noreply@blogger.com